Subject	Re: No. It's talking about stock for stock...
Posted by	Pilot.P on September 27, 2007 at 2:20 PM
	This message has been viewed 33 times.
In Reply To	No. It's talking about stock for stock... posted by en5 on September 27, 2007 at 10:16 AM
Message	That kind of makes sense but not really, well, then it must be so precisely tuned for a manual conversion to be slower. 20hp less but you can even faster spool now since you are running on small turbos, and you are using the cams for the small turbos...I think it makes sense for it to be a faster to 0-100mph then? If someone can answer with reason that will be superb. I am middle of thinking whether manual conversions are worth it.
Follow Ups	Quick 0-60 question - Pilot.P 03:39:40 09/27/07 Not in stock form. The auto would need mods to beat the - Yoshi 05:52:43 09/27/07 wut? but It says that auto can beat manual to 100mph - Pilot.P 06:05:16 09/27/07 all driver honestly. Even autos power brake launch (n/m) - z_samurai 07:57:35 09/27/07 Yup, when ever you talk about 10ths of a second... - Barry'z (NJ) 11:12:05 09/27/07 No. It's talking about stock for stock... - en5 10:16:55 09/27/07 Re: No. It's talking about stock for stock... - Pilot.P 14:20:14 09/27/07 I think the main reason some say the auto is/can be faster - TriniTT 13:23:31 09/27/07 Re: I think the main reason some say the auto is/can be faster - Slider 22:43:56 09/27/07 Human can't shift faster than a machine. (n/m) - AZHeat 13:46:16 09/27/07
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.